Putting the ‘Experiment’ back into the ‘Thought Experiment’

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Philosophers have debated at length the epistemological status of scientific thought experiments. I contend that literature on this topic still lacks a common conceptual framework, lacuna produces radical disagreement among participants in debate. To remedy problem, suggest focusing distinction between internal and external validity an experiment, which is also crucial for then develop account both kinds context show we can naturally conceptualise terms games make-believe. Then, argue best defined as accurate representation target system. Finally, turn back to current debate experiments my diarchic provides general framework be shared by competing philosophical views, well fruitful guide their reconciliation.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Epr Thought - Experiment and the Epr

Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) argued that the quantum-mechanical probabilistic description of physical reality had to be incomplete, in order to avoid an instantaneous action between distant measurements. This suggested the need for additional “hidden variables”, allowing for the recovery of determinism and locality, but such a solution has been disproved experimentally. Here, I present an...

متن کامل

The Thought Experiment Approach to Qualitative Physics

This paper discusses the application of the thought experiment methodology to qualita­ tive reasoning. Problem solving using this technique involves simplification of the origi­ nal problem, solution of the simplified problem, and generalization of the results obtained. Our emphasis in this work is to demonstrate the ef­ fectiveness of this approach in addressing com­ plexity and grain size iss...

متن کامل

The neurology–psychiatry divide: a thought experiment†

Diseases of the brain are generally classified as either neurological or psychiatric. However, these two groups of illnesses cannot be readily separated on the basis of pathophysiology or symptomatology. It is difficult to rationally explain to someone with no prior frame of reference why we have the split between neurological and psychiatric illness. This demonstrates that the division is unte...

متن کامل

Notes on Leibniz thought experiment

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Monadology (1714), §17 [1]: “Besides, it must be admitted that perception, and anything that depends on it, cannot be explained in terms of mechanistic causation – that is, in terms of shapes and motions. Let us pretend that there was a machine, which was constructed in such a way as to give rise to thinking, sensing, and having perceptions. You could imagine it expan...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Synthese

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['0039-7857', '1573-0964']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-04011-3